leukemic k562 cell line (ATCC)
Structured Review

Leukemic K562 Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 11229 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/leukemic k562 cell line/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 11229 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "UBE2O as a key regulator of drug-induced erythropoiesis in the context of myelodysplastic syndromes"
Article Title: UBE2O as a key regulator of drug-induced erythropoiesis in the context of myelodysplastic syndromes
Journal: Blood Advances
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017340
Figure Legend Snippet: Erythropoietin-induced erythroid differentiation promotes UBE2O expression. (A) Percentages of benzidine-positive K562 cells (blue) treated with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin for 0 to 3 days, compared with nontreated control (NTC) cells. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis (n = 3). (B) Representative images of benzidine staining of K562 cells treated with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin for 0 to 3 days. Red arrows indicate benzidine-positive cells (blue). The images are representative of 3 independent experiments. (C) Relative mRNA levels of UBE2O and GATA1 in K562 cells on days 0 to 3 after treatment with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin on day 0. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (n = 3). (D) Representative western blot analysis of UBE2O and GATA1 in K562 cells treated with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin for 0 to 3 days. Vinculin was used as a loading control. (E) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for UBE2O in K562 cells treated with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin for 0 to 2 days, compared with NTC cells (n = 5). DAPI staining was used to highlight nuclei. (F) Relative number of UBE2O (green spots) in K562 cells treated with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin for 0 to 2 days (n = 5). Ordinary 1-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. (G) Correlation between UBE2O and GATA1 mRNA levels in K562 cells aftertreatment with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin on day 0, and the expression levels of the genes were compared on days 1 and 2. The black line indicates the linear regression fit. EPO, erythropoietin. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; and ∗∗∗∗ P < .0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Staining, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: Luspatercept’s inhibition of the TGF-β pathway promotes UBE2O upregulation. (A) Percentages of benzidine-positive K562 cells (blue) treated with 1 μg/mL luspatercept for 0 to 3 days, compared with nontreated control (NTC) cells (n = 3). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (n = 3). (B) Representative images of benzidine staining of K562 cells treated with 1 μg/mL luspatercept for 0 to 3 days. The red arrows indicate benzidine-positive cells (blue). The images are representative of 3 independent experiments. (C) Relative mRNA levels of UBE2O and GATA1 in K562 cells on days 0 to 3 after treatment with 1 μg/mL luspatercept on day 0. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (n = 3). (D) Representative western blot analysis of UBE2O, GATA1, and p-Smad3 in K562 cells treated with 1 μg/mL luspatercept for 0 to 3 days. Vinculin and GAPDH were used as loading controls. (E) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for UBE2O in K562 cells treated with 1 μg/mL luspatercept for 0 to 2 days, compared with NTC cells (n = 5). DAPI staining was used to highlight nuclei. (F) Relative number of UBE2O (green spots) in K562 cells treated with 1 μg/mL luspatercept for 0 to 2 days (n = 5). Ordinary 1-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. (G) Correlation between UBE2O and GATA1 mRNA levels in K562 cells aftertreatment with 1 μg/mL luspatercept on day 0, and the expression levels of the genes were compared on days 1 and 2. The black line indicates the linear regression fit. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; LUSPA, luspatercept; p-Smad3, phosphorylated Smad3. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; and ∗∗∗∗ P < .0001.
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Control, Staining, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: GATA1 regulates UBE2O expression during erythroid differentiation. (A) Graphic representation of the predicted GATA1 motif “CTAATCT” identified using the JASPAR 2020 database. (B) Table summarizing the statistical significance of the GATA1 motif, including its P value (7.38 × 10 −6 ) and q value (0.0146). (C) Genome browser snapshot showing the localization of the GATA1 motif (highlighted) at position chr17:76,453,056-76,453,066 relative to the transcriptional start site and adjacent regulatory elements. (D) Real-time qPCR of UBE2O, BCL-XL (positive control), and NFKBIA (negative control) DNA from K562 cells following ChIP performed 1 day after treatment with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin (n = 2). (E) Representative image of qualitative PCR of DNA from K562 cells following ChIP performed after 1 day of treatment with 10 IU/mL erythropoietin. (F) Real-time qPCR of UBE2O, BCL-XL (positive control), and NFKBIA (negative control) DNA from K562 cells following ChIP performed 1 day after treatment with 1 μg/mL luspatercept (LUSPA) (n = 2). (G) Representative image of qualitative PCR of DNA from K562 cells following ChIP performed after 1 day of treatment with 1 μg/mL luspatercept. CTR − , negative control; CTR + , positive control.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Positive Control, Negative Control

